Please keep the forum protocol in mind when posting.

Rules Q&A » Post: Impact Resonance - Ambigous wording needs official answer

Impact Resonance - Ambigous wording needs official answer

April 6, 2015 01:22:15 PM

Olle Liljefeldt
Judge (Level 1 (Judge Academy))

Europe - North

Impact Resonance - Ambigous wording needs official answer

Commander 2014 brought us Impact Resonance, a card which functionality seems all but clear.
Gatherer gives us some basics, but fails to describe a common scenario.

Let me illustrate the problem with an example:

Ruric Thar, the Unbowed is in play. I play two spells (say, brainstorm and ponder), which results in Ruric dealing me a total of 12 damage. I then play Impact Resonance. From Gatherer (see link above) we know that Rurics trigger from playing Impact will not be included in the amount of damage to be dealt. But there is an ambiguity regarding how to interpret how much damage Impact will deal.

Reasoning A:
“Greatest amont” is interpreted as of each effect. This perspective, which is widely suggested on web forums, indicates that in the example above Impact will yield 6 damage. And Pestilence would only yield 1 damage no matter how many activations you do.

Reasoning B:
“Greatest amont” is on source/receiver basis. I.e. accumulated. So for each pair of source/receiver, find the maximum amount of damage dealt. In the example above, Impact would yield 12 damage to distribute. And Pestilence would yield X damage, where X is how many activations you do.


I would expect a clarification of e.g. "…the greatest amount of damage dealt by a source to a permanent or player at a single moment this turn" if version A was intended. But I can see the possibility of either being the intended functionality.

I believe an official answer is needed on this one, as speculations seems to be widespread whilst I have failed to find any official ruling. My guess is on version B, mainly based on the lack of clarification as described above, and based on rulings regaring Ogre Enforcer

April 7, 2015 03:10:33 AM

Callum Milne
Forum Moderator
Judge (Uncertified)

Canada - Western Provinces

Impact Resonance - Ambigous wording needs official answer

This question was asked earlier as well, so I posted the answer there first.

Reasoning A is correct. In the scenario you gave, Impact Resonance will deal 6 damage total, since 6 is the greatest single amount of damage dealt in any one instance by any one source to any one permanent or player.
  • Index
  • » Rules Q&A
  • » Impact Resonance - Ambigous wording needs official answer