Originally posted by Joel Bouzaglou:
I decided to post it here
Great idea, thanks!!!
Originally posted by Joel Bouzaglou:
do you step in before the other person accepts and dq the briber or do you wait till the other person accepts or refuses then dq one or both if them
I'm not a big fan of entrapment, and we are empowered to step in as soon as we're aware of an infraction; the same is true of rolling dice.
I believe there are many who will wait to see if the opponent will take the bait, but I don't think that gives players a good judge-interaction experience.
Consider, also, that the players who know that the offer is wrong are most likely to notice the judge nearby and not fall for the “trap”; doesn't it seem better to quickly educate those who could innocently step into that trap?
Lastly - I like to tell players “If you want to discuss a prize split, concession, draw, etc., with your opponent, and you're not completely sure about legality - just get a judge, and talk to them before making any offer.” I hope it goes without saying that, if a player approaches you and asks “can I offer my opponent $100 to concede, you educate - not DQ them for asking you”.
Thanks! – Scott Marshall, L5, Denver